|
|
|
2011 Chambers USA Guide Ranks 9 Greenberg Traurig Phoenix Attorneys
Press Release |
2011/06/22 22:31
|
Chambers and Partners, an annual guide featuring the leading U.S. lawyers and law firms, announced that 9 attorneys from Greenberg Traurig’s Phoenix office have been selected for inclusion in its Chambers USA 2011 guide. Chambers and Partners selects attorneys based upon thousands of interviews with practicing lawyers and with clients around the world. This stringent research and review process yields an exclusive compilation of the leading attorneys in their respective fields.
The following Greenberg Traurig Phoenix attorneys have been honored by Chambers USA in its 2011 Guide:
nbsp;nbsp; Brian H. Blaney - Corporate/Mamp;A
nbsp;nbsp; Rebecca Lynne Burnham - Real Estate
nbsp;nbsp; Robert S. Kant - Corporate/Mamp;A
nbsp;nbsp; Leslie Klein - Labor amp; Employment: Employee Benefits amp; Compensation
nbsp;nbsp; Bruce E. Macdonough - Corporate/Mamp;A
nbsp;nbsp; Daniel B. Pasternak - Labor amp; Employment
nbsp;nbsp; Lawrence J. Rosenfeld - Labor amp; Employment
nbsp;nbsp; Lesa J. Storey - Real Estate
nbsp;nbsp; Quinn Williams - Corporate/Mamp;A
About Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is an international, full-service law firm with approximately 1800 attorneys serving clients from more than 30 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. In the U.S., the firm has more offices than any other among the Top 10 on The National Law Journal’s 2011 NLJ 250. In the U.K., the firm operates as Greenberg Traurig Maher LLP. Greenberg Traurig has a strategic alliance with the independent law firm, Studio Santa Maria in Milan and Rome. The firm was Chambers and Partners' USA Law Firm of the Year in 2007 and among the Top 3 in the International Law Firm of the Year at the 2009 The Lawyer Awards. For additional information, please visit http://www.gtlaw.com. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Menzer Hill, P.A. Announces Investigation
Press Release |
2010/09/09 09:39
|
strongThe Securities Arbitration Firm of Menzer amp; Hill, P.A. Announces Investigation Into The Sales Practices Of Broker-Dealers That Solicited Purchases of Inverse and Leveraged Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
/strongThe Securities Arbitration Firm of Menzer amp; Hill, P.A. (a href=http://www.suemyadvisor.com/font face=Verdanawww.suemyadvisor.com/font/a) announced today that it is investigating the sales practices of brokerage firms that solicited investors to buy leveraged and inversed Exchanged-Traded Funds (“ETFs”). Many brokerage firms, through their financial advisors, are soliciting purchases in these securities as investments, with holding periods longer than one day, while others are recommending option strategies on the underlying ETFs. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), stated in a Regulatory Notice, sent to brokerage firms June 2009, that leveraged and inverse ETFs are “highly complex financial instruments” and “are typically not suitable for retail investors who plan to hold them for more than one trading [day], particularly in volatile markets.” Brokerage firms that failed to adhere to suitability requirements could be held liable to investors that sustained losses in solicited purchases of leveraged and inverse ETFs as a result. pInvestors that have purchased leveraged or inverse ETFs through a brokerage account or managed account offered by Merrill Lynch, a subsidiary of Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (NYSE:MS), Wells Fargo Advisors (NYSE:WFC), Ameriprise Financial (NYSE:AMP), UBS (NYSE:UBS), LPL Financial, Raymond James (NYSE:RJF), Edward Jones, or other brokerage firms and have sustained losses should contact the attorneys at the Securities Arbitration Firm of Menzer amp; Hill, P.A. to determine if they have a claim for a recovery of losses. /ppLeveraged and inverse ETFs can be volatile and investors may have realized or unrealized losses in the following ETFs year to date, including but not limited to: /ptable id=t6420933_1 class=bwtablebottommargin cellspacing=0tbodytrtd id=t6420933_1_0_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftDRV down 63% (NYSEArca: DRV); /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_1_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftTMV down 46% (NYSEArca: TMV); /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_2_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftVXX down 44% (NYSEArca: VXX); /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_3_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftSRS down 43% (NYSEArca: SRS); /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_4_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftZSL down 42% (NYSEArca: ZSL); /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_5_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftGAZ down 38% (NYSEArca: GAZ); /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_6_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftTZA down 36% (NYSEArca: TZA); /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_7_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftUNG down 35% (NYSEArca: UNG); /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_8_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftTBT down 34% (NYSEArca: TBT); /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_9_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftFAZ down 29% (NYSEArca: FAZ); and /td/trtrtd id=t6420933_1_10_46200 class=bwcellpaddingleft0 bwverticalaligntop bwtextalignleftUCO down 28% (NYSEArca: UCO). /td/tr/tbody/tablepFor a free case evaluation or to discuss any other investment losses, please contact the Securities Arbitration Firm of Menzer amp; Hill, P.A., at 888-923-9223, or visit us on the web at a href=http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlinkamp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.suemyadvisor.comamp;esheet=6420934amp;lan=en-USamp;anchor=www.suemyadvisor.comamp;index=2amp;md5=42f88a77817321b3764807a671c4f30d target=_blankfont face=Verdanawww.suemyadvisor.com/font/a. /pdiv id=releaseBottomdiv id=contactsdiv id=contactsBody class=bddiv class=cpMenzer amp; Hill, P.A.
Gary Menzer, 888-923-9223
a href=http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlinkamp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.suemyadvisor.comamp;esheet=6420934amp;lan=en-USamp;anchor=www.suemyadvisor.comamp;index=3amp;md5=74419b7bab2fc6896122e36968209bd0 target=_blankfont face=Verdanawww.suemyadvisor.com/font/a /p/div/div/div/div |
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to find the best Georgia bankruptcy lawyer online
Press Release |
2010/09/07 09:22
|
pWhy should you go about filing bankruptcy? Well simply put, filing a Georgia bankruptcy does not mean you are giving up; in fact it provides you with a second chance financially. Not to mention thousands of Georgia residents seek the help of Georgia bankruptcy lawyers each year for assistance./ppIf you are planning on filing Georgia bankruptcy, it’s really important for you to know that the new state bankruptcy laws are making it harder for people to file. Many people who actually make too much money, compared to other residents in the state, are now being forced to go about filing bankruptcy under Chapter 13./ppFiling bankruptcy under chapter 7 on the other hand can clear up a lot of debt and provide you with a fresh start, mainly by eliminating all of your credit card debt in a matter of mere months. Filing Chapter 13 bankruptcy with the help of a Georgia bankruptcy attorney on is a bit different, since no debts are actually canceled; it just buys you some time./ppAfter you’ve gone and figured out what you’re eligible for, the next step for you to accomplish is to hire a professional Georgia bankruptcy attorney who can help you to remove or even pay back debts that you have by filing. A good Georgia bankruptcy lawyer actually ends up saving you money when all is said and done./ppAfter you have gone about hiring a Georgia bankruptcy attorney, you can then go about successfully filing bankruptcy in Georgia federal courts. These particular courts follow the same bankruptcy code used by all states, but state bankruptcy law dictates that these courts will also factor in the median income for Georgia residents.
/p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Boies Urges ABA Members
Press Release |
2010/08/08 08:48
|
pDavid Boies challenged America’s lawyers to “bring the rule of law to its full fruition here in this country … to fulfill the goals and lofty rhetoric of our founding fathers,” as the keynote speaker at the Opening Assembly of the 2010 ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco. /ppThe rule of law was the assembly theme, as ABA members gathered in the Herbst Theater of the War Memorial Veterans Building, site of the signing of the charter of the United Nations in 1945. nbsp; /ppPresident Carolyn B. Lamm pointed to ABA efforts from activities of the Section of International Law to such projects as the Central European and Eurasian Law Initiative, the Rule of Law Initiative and the World Justice Project as advancing United Nations goals to spread democracy based on law around the world. /ppBoies, co-counsel with Ted Olson in winning a federal district court ruling Wednesday that overturned California’s Proposition 8, cited “numerous challenges to the rule of law in our own country,” in applying that theme at home. /ppWhen our nation was born, it consisted of “wes” and “theys,” Boies said, with the “wes” being white male property owners and the “theys” comprising everyone else.nbsp; As the national history unfolded, the circle of “wes” expanded to encompass more and more segments of society. nbsp; /pp“We have an opportunity to expand the circle of ‘wes’ until there are no more ‘theys,’” said Boies, urging lawyers to work toward ensuring that “liberty and equality and protection of individual rights is something that every citizen equally enjoys.”/ppTo achieve that goal, Boies identified four challenges confronting his audience./ppFirst, he suggested the rule of law works best when adversaries have equivalent resources, whether those resources are plentiful or sparse. nbsp; But the “time when our system tends to break down is when one party has tremendous resources and the other party does not.”nbsp; Those are the times that “threatened to undermine the protections of the rule of law… [and lawyers] need to find ways to reduce the imbalance,” he said.nbsp; He urged reducing procedural advantages that favor the “better resourced party,” and urged lawyers to not “use discovery as a war of attrition,” for example.nbsp;
nbsp; nbsp;
Second, he called for “better tools to help juries” decide important but complex cases, such as allowing jurors to ask questions and take notes on testimony. /ppHis third challenge was to “improve judges and the judicial machinery,” citing a “crisis in terms of financing the justice system in the United States.”nbsp; First year associates in his law firm are paid higher salaries than federal district court judges, and state court judges earn even less, he said.nbsp; “If we can’t afford to spend a fraction of what we are spending to expand that system to Iraq, something is wrong with our sense of priorities,” he maintained. nbsp; /ppAll lawyers must stand up for the independence of judges, resisting threats to their safety when they make unpopular decisions, said Boies, noting that there already have been threats to harm the judge whonbsp; ruled in the Proposition 8 litigation. /ppBoies’ cited predictably equal application of the law without regard to the identity of the parties as the final challenge to the rule of law, saying that when rights depend on who is asserting them, “the rule of law is undermined.”/p |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal News RSS Feed
